I was responding to Bruce's post, Paul
P3DV2.2 - Santa Barbara Performance and Visual issues?
#21
Posted 19 May 2014 - 01:47 pm
#22
Posted 19 May 2014 - 01:52 pm
oc to 4GHz
#23
Posted 19 May 2014 - 02:24 pm
I notice that you have your framerate locked at 30fps. I normally have mine locked at 25fps, but testing with SIM720 KSBA showed a massive improvement in framerates when I reset this to Unlimited. Can you check that, and report back?
#24
Posted 19 May 2014 - 04:36 pm
How strange ---- with fps set at "unlimited" I'm now getting 21fps with ALL boxes ticked & autogen at "extremely dense"
The usual rule in fsx is to limit your fps to say 25/30 but this seems NOT to be the case with KSBA
All those having low fps should absolutely try setting to "unlimited", even setting to "99" makes no difference must be "unlimited"
Thanks for the tip
#25
Posted 19 May 2014 - 04:51 pm
That's great news, Bruce. By the way, they must have used the entire catalogue of paint colours for that plane
#26
Posted 19 May 2014 - 04:52 pm
Hi Paul,
I'll test with the A36 and let you know, typically the A36 does seem to provide the best frame rates overall.
I'll also disable Vector and see ... but FYI, Vector 1.15 was enabled when I tested earlier with Sim720 KSBA disabled and fps were 44-45.
I've also tried deleting the shaders, but that didn't make any difference.
Flickering I've seen is only with buildings ... those buildings were on the Hollister Ave side ... around Cass Pl.
I know it's a pain Paul, but could you share your 5 screens of P3D settings ... that might help me do apples to apples compare. Also, time of day and weather are very important with P3D.
@Bruce, yes Unlimited will typically yield higher frame rates but it will also tend to do wild fluctuations in frame rates and in some cases may make the hi-res terrain loading not able to keep up.
Cheers, Rob.
Edited by Rob Ainscough, 19 May 2014 - 04:55 pm.
Rob.
#27
Posted 19 May 2014 - 04:57 pm
I know it's a pain Paul, but could you share you 5 screens of P3D settings ... that might help me do apples to apples compare.
I set mine to what you have in your link above but i can take screenshots tomorrow if you like.
as for the flickering buildings will take another look.
Paul
#28
Posted 19 May 2014 - 06:04 pm
@Bruce, yes Unlimited will typically yield higher frame rates but it will also tend to do wild fluctuations in frame rates and in some cases may make the hi-res terrain loading not able to keep up.
I wasn't expecting low end framerates to be significantly different between capped and Unlimited modes. For example, if the framerate is 20 when I have it set to Unlimited, then I would expect it to be 20 when the framerate is capped at (say) 25 or 30. Surely the point of "capped" mode is to prevent the user's PC wasting power on ridiculously high framerates when it could be put to better use rendering more complex visual scenes? If it is going to significantly reduce the framerates even below the "capped" limit, then that is affecting the user experience in a negative way, not a positive one.
#29
Posted 19 May 2014 - 06:21 pm
@bruce so you get zero change in fps what so ever?
Might've gone up a frame or two, but still too much like a slideshow to be flyable.
Intel Core i7-4790 Haswell 4.0 GHz EVGA Z97 Classified EVGA Supernova 850 G2 G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB Western Digital 1TB GeForce GTX 780 Superclock
#31
Posted 20 May 2014 - 06:12 pm
Just wanted to report back on some more testing I did at KSBA.
Display/nVidia Settings here: http://www.robainsco...Settings_2.html
KSBA - Gate 37
Aircraft = LM's/Carenado A36
Weather = Clear
Date/Time = 5/19/2014 19:09:00
EDIT: to be noted, view direction has a significant impact on reported fps ... in this test I kept the view direction identical. But to demonstrate how testing can be skewed, if I change views to look at the runway rather than buildings/gates I'll see almost 2X improvement in fps ... in example above item #4 Orbx airport source, I will see 44-45 fps when facing the runway vs. facing the building/gates where it's 26 fps.
PC specification:
Intel i7 3960X @ 4.6Ghz
32GB RAM @ 2133Mhz
Titan 6GB (PCI-e 3.0 x 16)
3TB SSDs (SATA6)
Edited by Rob Ainscough, 20 May 2014 - 10:04 pm.
Rob.
#32
Posted 20 May 2014 - 08:42 pm
Quick video I made of the flicker and fps performance with all KSBA options ON.
https://www.youtube....h?v=5tcECrr1QmE
Cheers, Rob.
Rob.
#33
Posted 20 May 2014 - 10:01 pm
Did some testing and "I think" I've narrowed down the problem at KSBA ... it appears to be related to the AI Dash 8 (American Pacific - not Majestics) aircraft model. Since it's not a "static" aircraft it will depart (eventually) from it's gate and when it does my performance will go from 26 to 40 fps.
I increased the sim rate to 32x and waited for the Dash 8 (American Pacific) to depart, once that happened I returned the sim rate back to "Normal" and noticed my fps are now at 40 ... view was not changed at all during this process (as I didn't want to skew results).
So I guess the question now is, who's Dash 8 AI aircraft model is that? It's NOT Majestic's. Is this a model provided by Sim720 or is it from Orbx or LM?
Cheers, Rob.
Rob.
#34
Posted 20 May 2014 - 10:07 pm
Will look at the flickers in your video tomorrow.
Paul
#35
Posted 20 May 2014 - 10:11 pm
I'm not running any AI Traffic products, just whatever comes with P3DV2.2. Any hints on where I should look for this AI model ... SimObjects\Airplanes\DH_Dash8_100 ?
Rob.
#36
Posted 20 May 2014 - 10:18 pm
#37
Posted 20 May 2014 - 10:21 pm
Yeah that was the location, move the entire folder to another drive, loaded up saved flight and AI Dash8 was gone, however the frame rates were back to 26 ... so false alarm, sorry ... it's not the AI Dash 8.
I'll keep digging and trying out stuff ... but whatever is in the direction of my view in the video I posted that shows the AI Dash 8 seems to be the consumer of fps.
Edited by Rob Ainscough, 20 May 2014 - 10:23 pm.
Rob.
#38
Posted 21 May 2014 - 07:25 am
When you get a chance can you turn all AI off and see if the fps improves as the dash 8 might of been else where in the airport, in the mean time i will keep looking.
#39
Posted 14 September 2014 - 03:43 am
I just wanted to bring this thread back as performance is still poor and runway lights are horrible at night. What's the status on these issues? Runway lights seem to work fine at other airports, so what's the issue with this one?
Todd
#40
Posted 16 September 2014 - 01:39 pm
Hi Todd,
We are currently testing a patch for all our airports to replace the runway lights with default lights due to the lighting issue in P3Dv2 which affects all our airports. Should be released by the weekend.
Paul
- Christopher Low and GordonH like this
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Active
Active
Support →
Product Support →
Installation on steam edition - managed to install but how select the plane?Started by sligoduck , 21 Jan 2024 Active |
|
|
||
Active
Support →
Product Support →
Help with windsocks pleaseStarted by ricardino , 19 Nov 2020 Active, windsocks |
|
|
||
Active
Support →
Product Support →
McClellan–Palomar Airport IssuesStarted by Roxy3636 , 07 Sep 2017 Active |
|
|
||
Active
Support →
Compatibility Forum →
Aerosoft Enhancment ServicesStarted by Jonathan Winton , 27 Jun 2014 Active |
|
|
||
Active
Support →
Product Support →
No shadows on Stornoway apron (P3Dv2.2)Started by GordonH , 02 May 2014 Active |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users